|
Guilty Until Proven Innocent
Two families suffer from a doctor's best
intentions.
By Denise Grollmus
Published: April 18, 2007
It was around 10 p.m., and Trenton was getting fussy.
The three-month-old was convulsing like a worm in his
father's arms.
Photo by Walter Novak
Nathan Humrighouse with son Trenton. Nathan was
accused of child abuse when Trenton suffered a brain
injury in a fall.
"The ramifications of my diagnosis are huge," says Dr.
Steiner.
photos by Walter Novak
Monica and Trenton were separated from Nathan for
seven months.
Photo by Walter Novak
"Everyone kept telling us Dr. Steiner is never
wrong," says LeAnn.
Photo by Walter Novak
Becca worried she'd be taken from her parents too.
Photo by Walter Novak
Rachel was separated from her father, Dan, for four
months.
Photo by Walter Novak
Bill Whitaker twice proved Steiner was wrong.
|
Nathan Humrighouse held him with outstretched arms,
raising him just above his head. "Ssh, ssh, ssh," Nathan
chanted to his son.
But Trenton wasn't having it. He wiggled out of Nathan's
grip and dove directly into his face. The fall startled
both father and son.
Nathan, a 31-year-old nurse, carefully examined Trenton.
Though he appeared to be fine, he called his wife, Monica.
She too was a nurse, working the night shift at Canton's
Aultman Hospital, having just returned from maternity leave.
A doctor told her to bring the baby in, just to be safe.
That's when a CAT scan revealed that Trenton had suffered
a subdural hematoma -- bleeding within the Saran-wrap-like
lining of the brain. "We knew what it was immediately,"
Monica says. "We knew how serious it was, what kind of
brain damage it could cause, and we were shocked and upset."
Since Aultman didn't specialize in working with infants,
Trenton was transferred to Akron Children's Hospital.
Doctors and nurses did their best to console the visibly
shaken parents. "The ER physician told us that children
recover easily from this," Nathan says. "He even said that
his son had suffered a subdural hematoma from birth."
But they were also warned that whenever infants arrive
with head injuries, it's required that the hospital
investigate the possibility of child abuse.
As Trenton underwent more tests, his parents met with
social workers and nurses, telling their story again and
again. "They all told us it was nothing out of the
ordinary," Nathan says. "And we were fine with it. We were
glad they were being so thorough."
Trenton was kept overnight for observation. His parents
never left his side.
The following day, the couple met with Dr. Daryl
Steiner, a lean man whose salt-and-pepper beard creates an
air of physician's distinction.
Steiner pulled the couple into a separate room. He
didn't ask questions, didn't offer consolation. Instead, he
stared coldly at Nathan and accused him of abuse.
Nathan's story didn't jibe with Trenton's injury, Steiner
said. The only thing that could cause a brain to bleed like
that was if Nathan violently shook his son. This was, 100
percent, a case of shaken-baby syndrome, he informed the
couple.
Steiner ordered Nathan to leave the hospital immediately
and to have no further contact with Trenton. The couple
would have to meet with Stark County Child Protective
Services.
Monica burst into hysterical tears. "It was bad enough
that our son had a serious injury," she says. "But to be
accused of causing it?"
Dr. Steiner has seen some horrific things in his 31
years at Children's Hospital. He's treated kids burned
beyond recognition, bloodied babies who've been slammed
against walls, infants who've been squeezed so tight, their
ribs were crushed into shards of irreparable bones. So he
dedicated his life to protecting defenseless children.
He began his career at Children's, a fat slab of concrete
that dominates Akron's skyline. By 1991, he was appointed
director of the hospital's Children at Risk Evaluation
Center, better known as the C.A.R.E Center.
At the time, it was just a small part of Children's
emergency-room operations. But in Steiner's hands, it
quickly became one of the most respected child-abuse centers
in the country. He built his own staff and perfected its
evaluation process.
At the same time, a newly discovered phenomenon was
drawing much attention in the field.
For decades, infants had been turning up in emergency
rooms with brain injuries -- but without any visible signs
of trauma. In the late '60s, doctors determined that this
condition could be caused by the simple act of shaking a
baby. It wasn't until 30 years later, however, that
medicine christened this mysterious malady with a name:
shaken-baby syndrome.
Soon, hospitals nationwide were launching public
awareness campaigns, warning anyone in reach of a baby about
the deadly effects of shaking an infant. In Akron, there
was a time when you couldn't drive down Market Street
without seeing a billboard showing a smiling child next to
the slogan "Never, Never, Never Shake a Baby." Steiner was
behind it all.
Among the movement's most vociferous advocates, he
devised a special evaluation process for suspected cases.
First, the child is given a CAT scan for brain trauma.
If bleeding under the brain lining is discovered, Steiner
then looks for bleeding behind the eyes. If both conditions
are present, he then interviews the parents.
There are few causes for a brain injury of this kind, he
believes -- a bad car crash, a serious fall -- or, most
likely, violent shaking by a perturbed parent. "I think
it's an extremely violent event -- nothing approaching the
normal handling of a child," Steiner says.
If the parents' story doesn't match up -- or they simply
don't have a story to tell -- Steiner's diagnosis is abuse.
"I have never had a caregiver come to me and say, 'Well, I
threw the baby up against the wall,'" he says. "And the
child can't tell me either. It's only after the
investigation that the confessions come."
In the past 25 years, he's diagnosed at least 275 infants
with the syndrome.
"It's a very agonizing decision," he says. "I have to be
100 percent correct, because if I diagnose a child as abused
and it's not, it's as damaging to the child and the family
as if I return a child to an abusive environment. The
ramifications of my diagnosis are huge."
Unfortunately, Steiner has been wrong -- on more than one
occasion.
LeAnn Dunkle sits at her dining-room table, surrounded by
her husband, parents, sister, and two daughters.
She's wrapped in a cozy beige cardigan, her youngest
daughter tight at her chest. "I wish I never knew how easy
it is to lose your children," she says. "And it is so
easy."
LeAnn and her husband Dan stumbled across this
unfortunate truth last July. The family was preparing for a
camping trip. As LeAnn packed the hot dogs and diapers, Dan
strapped their three-month-old daughter Rachel into a mobile
car seat and placed her on a table.
He went about his preparations, then suddenly heard a
loud thump and crying. He ran to find his three-year-old
daughter, Becca, standing over her little sister, who was
now laying face first on the floor, the car seat on top of
her.
Dan quickly looked Rachel over. Nothing was bleeding or
broken. "After about five minutes, she calmed down," Dan
says. "She was scared more than anything."
Still, the Dunkles wanted to be safe. They called
Rachel's pediatrician, who said she was more than likely
fine, but if they wanted, they could take her to the
emergency room.
The couple made the 30-minute drive from Wadsworth to
Children's Hospital. A CAT scan revealed a subdural
hematoma. "We had no idea what that meant," LeAnn says.
"So when they said her brain was bleeding -- that feeling,
it was terrifying. The whole room got long and narrow
quickly."
Rachel was kept for observation. LeAnn spent the night
with her, while Dan went home to watch Becca.
The next day they switched places. That's when Dan met
Dr. Steiner. "He said, '100 percent shaken baby,'" Dan
says. "He said the only other things that could cause it
were a 35-mph crash or a three-story fall."
Steiner ordered more tests. For the next two days, the
family waited patiently through numerous MRIs, eye exams,
and the scrutiny of social workers.
Steiner finally returned with his diagnosis: 100 percent
shaken-baby syndrome.
"But that's impossible!" LeAnn shouted. She threatened
to leave with Rachel, but was told she'd be arrested. It
would be best if she left the hospital voluntarily. She
collapsed in grief, but helplessly agreed to go. "We
thought that if we just cooperated, it'd all be over
quickly," she says.
Dan called LeAnn's parents, who arrived at the hospital
to watch over Rachel.
A few hours later, Medina Children Services arrived at
the room, where the infant lay asleep in her grandmother's
arms. "You're not taking this baby," Maureen Sega told
them.
But it was no use. They were armed with a court order.
The social worker pried Rachel from Sega's arms and
disappeared. "It was one of the most horrible days of my
life," Sega says.
The following week was a nightmare. Rachel was placed in
foster care, her family clueless as to her whereabouts.
LeAnn and Dan endured harsh questioning from social workers,
who parsed their every word. "I asked them if we needed a
lawyer," LeAnn says. "And the social worker says, 'Do you
think you need a lawyer?' It was always guilty until you
could prove yourself innocent."
Finally, Sega and her husband, who live next door to
LeAnn and Dan, got temporary custody of Rachel.
Over the next four months, the Dunkles could only have
supervised visits with their daughter. LeAnn often found
herself peering through the window into her parents' house,
pained that she wasn't the one rocking her little girl to
sleep.
Three-year-old Becca suffered pangs of guilt, worried
she'd be taken away too. "She was so scared," LeAnn says.
"She'd say, 'Sorry I hurt Rachel. Will I have to go away
too?'"
For the first time in their lives, the Dunkles had to
hire a lawyer. They enlisted Bill Whitaker and his daughter
Andrea. As the Whitakers built their case, LeAnn and Dan's
lives were thrown into total flux.
"They split us apart," says Sega. "It felt vindictive.
It was like how much pressure could they put on you until
you snap?"
Finally, last October, their hearing in Medina County
Juvenile Court took place. The Whitakers arrived with an
arsenal of doctors, medical journals, and character
witnesses to battle Steiner. It worked.
Dan plays the voice mail that LeAnn left for him on
November 2 -- the day they got their daughter back. "She's
not abused!" LeAnn exclaims over the phone.
As the Dunkles celebrated the return of their baby girl,
the Humrighouses prepared for the worst.
Steiner had accused both couples of abuse within weeks of
each other, but the Humrighouse case stretched on for twice
as long.
After Nathan was ordered to leave Children's Hospital,
Stark County Child Protective Services placed him under a
no-contact order. Monica and Trenton moved into her
mother's house.
For the next seven months, Nathan wasn't allowed to see
his son without a social worker present. He missed most of
Trenton's firsts, from sitting up to crawling. The joy of
Thanksgiving and Christmas was replaced by separation and
loss. "For those seven months, he didn't know me," Nathan
says. "He was completely uprooted from what he knew and
where he lived."
Then, a day after Christmas, things took a turn for the
worse. Nathan was indicted for child endangerment, a
second-degree felony. Steiner was the prosecution's only
witness. "Steiner had told them that it was, absolutely,
abuse," Nathan says. "He said it needed to be prosecuted in
criminal court."
For the first time in his life, Nathan found himself in
jail. He was placed on leave at Aultman Hospital and faced
a prison sentence of two to eight years. "I was terrified,"
he says. "I felt like we had to prove our innocence, rather
than the other way around."
As his hearing approached, Nathan and Monica remembered
reading about the Dunkles' case. They contacted Bill and
Andrea Whitaker.
By this time, Bill Whitaker had become something of an
expert on shaken-baby syndrome as well as Dr. Steiner's
methods. "Frankly, Dr. Steiner is not up-to-date on the
research that's been done as to the cause of subdural
hematomas," the lawyer says.
Whitaker took Trenton's medical records to Dr. Ronald
Uscinski, a pediatric neurosurgeon at Georgetown University
and an expert on subdural hematomas.
Uscinski concluded that Trenton's bleeding wasn't a
result of shaken-baby syndrome. It wasn't even caused by
the accident. It had been there since the day he was born.
Uscinski points to the way an infant's soft skull adjusts
to the shape of the mother's birth canal. In the case of
traumatic births, many babies' skulls will shift severely
enough to cause cranial bleeding. It's a common side effect
of the birth process that can sometimes cause severe brain
damage, but usually results in little more than a
cone-shaped head, just like Trenton's.
Medical records also showed that Monica had been in labor
for 22 hours before Trenton was free of the birth canal.
"It's more likely than not that he got it from birth,"
Uscinski says. "It's not unusual. Surgeons have known this
is common for a century or more."
Trenton's CAT scan from June -- the same scan Steiner
used to make his charges -- cemented Uscinski's thesis.
The scan shows a mixture of new blood and old,
distinguished by varying color and density. "Often time,
children will suffer a rebleed in the months after their
birth," Uscinski says. "It can be caused by literally
nothing. A baby can simply cry and have a rebleed."
On February 1, Uscinski said as much at Nathan's criminal
hearing. His claims were backed by Dr. Geneiso Serri, the
Aultman emergency-room doctor who saw Trenton on June 29.
"We didn't suspect abuse," Serri said. "Any child under
the age of one gets a CAT scan, because we're finding more
and more brain injuries resulting from minor trauma. You'd
be shocked by how the most trivial trauma causes subdural
hematomas."
The only voice of protest was Steiner's.
He said he knew of Trenton's difficulties at birth, but
ruled them out as a cause. He insisted that the only
possible cause of Trenton's injury was abuse. "The father
says they bumped heads," he said. "That's nothing, that's
trivial. The mere fact that he had a bleed showed this was
serious."
But the court didn't find his argument convincing.
A few days later, Judge Lee Sinclair threw out Nathan's
case. The Humrighouses were finally reunited.
Two months after their reunion, the couple is getting
used to normal life again. "Trenton's just now starting to
sleep through the night," Monica says. "It was a rough
adjustment." These days, he's an active toddler, insistent
upon walking by himself, even though he falls every few
feet.
The couple has no bitterness toward Steiner or Children's
Hospital. They're simply relieved to be together again.
"It made us realize that family is all that's important,"
Monica says. "I just thank God that [Trenton] will never
remember this."
But when they share their tale with others, they're not
greeted with the same forgive-and-forget resolve.
"A lot of people tell us that they're afraid of taking
their own kids to the hospital when they have accidents,"
Monica says. "It's scary for people to think how much power
they can lose and how much power one person can have over
their lives. I hate to say it, but I probably wouldn't take
[Trenton] to Children's ever again."
The Dunkles say their story elicits the same reaction.
After a friend's kid took a spill, he started heading to
Children's -- until he thought of the Dunkles' story. He
turned around, afraid of being accused of abuse.
"Everyone kept telling us, 'Dr. Steiner is never
wrong,'" LeAnn says. "But he has been wrong -- at least
twice. It's scary to think of how much authority these
doctors have. One person shouldn't be allowed to decide the
fate of our child."
Steiner can't comment on specific cases. He acknowledges
a legitimate debate over the causes of bleeding on the
brain. But he continues to stick by his methods.
"The idea that somebody can make a definitive diagnosis
on very minimal evidence -- it's of great concern," Bill
Whitaker says. "If parents are going to be misdiagnosed and
accused of abuse, it's a huge concern."
|