|
Ages & Stages Questionnaires:
A Parent-Completed, Child Monitoring System
By Diane Bricker, Jane Squires, and Linda Mounts with assistance from LaWanda Potter, Robert Nickel, and Jane Farrell |
Child's name: Ken McQUAID
Child's date of birth: Oct 16/96
Who is filling out this questionnaire? NKLA
What is your relationship to the child? PiP consultant
Your telephone:
Your mailing address:
City:
State:
zip code:
List people assisting in questionnaire completion:
parents
Today's date: Dec 16/99
Administering program or provider: PIP/DSS//DCAF
COMMUNICATION Be sure to try each activity with your child. | ||
1. When you ask her to point to her nose, then her eyes, hair, feet, ears, tummy and so forth, does your child point to at least seven body parts correctly? (She can point to parts of herself, you, or a doll). |
yes |
10 |
2. Does your child make sentences that are three or
four words long? Please give an example:
|
yes |
10 |
3. Without giving him help by pointing or using
gestures, ask your child to "Put the shoe on the table"
and "Put the book under the chair". Does your child
carry out both of these directions correctly?
|
yes |
10 |
4. When looking at a picturebook, does your child tell you what is happening or what action is taking place in the picture? (For example, "Barking", "Running", "Eating", and "Crying"). You may ask, "What is the dog (or boy) doing?" |
sometimes |
5 |
5. Show your child how a zipper on a coat moves up and down, and say, "See, this goes up and down". Put the zipper to the middle and ask your child to move the zipper down. Return the zipper to the middle and ask the child to move the zipper up. Do this several times, placing the zipper in the middle before asking the child to move it up or down. Does your child consistently move the zipper up when you say "up" and down when you say "down"? |
yes |
10 |
6. When you ask, "What is your name?" does your child say both her first and last name? |
sometimes |
5 |
COMMUNICATIONS TOTAL |
50 | |
GROSS MOTOR Be sure to try each activity with your child. | ||
1. Without holding onto anything for support, does your child kick a ball by swinging his leg forward? |
yes |
10 |
2. Does your child jump with both feet leaving the floor at the same time? |
no |
0 |
3. Does your child walk up stairs, using only one foot on each stair? The left foot on one step and the right foot on the next. She may hold onto the railing or wall. (You can look for this at a store, on a playground, or at home). |
no |
0 |
4. Does your child stand on one foot for about 1 second without holding onto anything? |
sometimes |
5 |
5. While standing, does your child throw a ball overhand by raising his arm to shoulder height and throwing the ball forward? (Dropping the ball or throwing the ball underhand does not count). |
yes |
10 |
6. Does your child jump forward at least 6 inches with both feet leaving the ground at the same time? |
no |
0 |
GROSS MOTOR TOTAL |
25 | |
FINE MOTOR Be sure to try each activity with your child. | ||
1. After she watches you draw a line from the top of the paper to the bottom with a pencil, crayon, or pen, ask your child to make a line like yours. Do not let your child trace your line. Does your child copy you by drawing a single line in a vertical direction? |
yes |
10 |
2. Does your child thread a shoelace through a bead or an eyelet of a shoe? |
yes |
10 |
3. After he watches you draw a single circle ask your child to make a circle like yours. Do not let her trace your circle. Does your child copy you by drawing a circle? |
yes |
10 |
4. After she watches you draw a line from one side of the paper to the other side, ask your child to make a line like yours. Do not let your child trace your line. Does your child copy you by drawing a single line in a horizontal direction? |
yes |
10 |
5. Does your child try to cut paper with child-safe scissors? He does not need to cut the paper but must get the blades to open and close while holding the paper with the other hand. (You may show your child how to use scissors). |
no |
0 |
| 6. When drawing, does your child hold a pencil, crayon, or pen between her fingers and thumb like an adult does? | no |
0 |
FINE MOTOR TOTAL |
40 | |
| PROBLEM SOLVING Be sure to try each activity with your child. | ||
1. While your child watches, line up four objects like blocks or cars in a row. Does your child copy you or imitate and line up four objects in a row? (You can also use spools or thread, small boxes, or other toys). |
yes |
10 |
2. If your child wants something he cannot reach, does he go and find something like a chair or box to stand on to reach it? |
to check | |
3. When you point to the figure and ask your child,
"What is this?" does your child say a word that means a
person? Responses like "snowman", "boy", "man", "girl",
and "Daddy" are correct. Please write your child's
response here:
|
no |
0 |
4. When you say, "Say seven three", does your child repeat just the two numbers in the correct order? Do not repeat the numbers, If necessary, try another pair of numbers and say, "Say eight two". Your child must repeat just one series of two numbers for you to answer "yes" to this question. |
yes |
10 |
5. Show your child how to make a bridge with blocks, boxes, or cans, like the example. does your child copy you by making one like it? |
to check | |
| 6. When you say "Say five eight three", does your child repeat just the three numbers in the correct order? Do not repeat these numbers. If necessary, try another series of numbers and say, "Say six nine two". Your child must repeat just one series of three numbers for you to answer "yes" to this question. | yes |
10 |
PROBLEM SOLVING TOTAL |
30+ | |
PERSONAL-SOCIAL Be sure to try each activity with your child. | ||
1. Does your child use a spoon to feed herself with little spilling? |
sometimes |
5 |
2. Does your child push a little shopping cart, stroller, or wagon, steering around objects and backing out of corners if he cannot turn? |
to check | |
3. When she is looking in a mirror and you ask, "Who is in the mirror?", does your child say either "Me" or her own name? |
yes |
10 |
4. Can your child put on a coat, jacket, or shirt by
himself?
|
no |
0 |
5. Using these exact words, ask your child, "Are you a girl or a boy?". Does your child answer correctly? |
no |
0 |
| 6. Does your child take turns by waiting while another child or adult takes a turn? | sometimes |
5 |
PERSONAL-SOCIAL TOTAL |
20+ | |
OVERALL Parents and providers may use the back of this sheet for additional comments. | ||
|
1. Do you think your child hears well?
If no, explain: |
yes | |
|
2. Do you think your child talks like other children
her age?
If no, explain: echolalia |
no | |
|
3. Can you understand most of what your child says?
If no, explain: |
yes | |
|
4. Do you think your child walks, runs, and climbs like
other children his age?
If no, explain: |
no | |
|
5. Does either parent have any family history of
childhood deafness or hearing impairment?
If yes, explain: |
to check | |
|
6. Has your child had any medical problems in the last
several months?
If yes, explain: |
to check | |
7. Does anything about your child worry you?
|
to check | |
OVERALL: Please transfer the answers in the Overall section of the questionnaire by circling "yes" or "no" and reporting any parents' comments.
1. |
Hears well? |
YES |
2. |
Talks like other children? |
NO |
3. |
Understand child? |
YES |
4. |
Walks, runs, and climbs like others? |
NO |
5. |
Family history of hearing impairment? |
to check |
6. |
Recent medical problems? |
to check |
7. |
Other concerns? |
to check |
SCORING THE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Be sure each question has been answered. If a question cannot be answered, refer to the ratio scoring procedure in The ASQ User's Guide.
2. Score each item on the questionnaire by writing the appropriate number on the line by each item answer. YES = 10, SOMETIMES = 5, NOT YET = 0.
3. Add up the item scores for each area and record these totals in the space provided for area totals.
4. Indicate the child's total score for each area by filling in the appropriate circle on the chart below. For example, if the total score for the Communication area was 50, fill in the circle below 50 in the first row.
5. If the child's total score falls at or above the cutoff the child appears to be doing well in this area at this time.
6. If the child's total falls below the cutoff, talk with a professional. The child may need further evaluation.
Score |
Cutoff | |
Communication |
50 |
38.7 |
Gross motor |
25 |
35.7 |
Fine motor |
40 |
30.0 |
Problem solving |
30 |
38.6 |
Personal-social |
20+ |
38.7 |
(The following document was prepared by a professional not associated with Children's Aid, who was retained by Friends at Hand-in-Hand day care to deal with Ken's rampage behavior. She found he was not eligible for help, because his score on the test was above the threshold of 60. The test without this note is filed in court. - RTMQ)
A. |
CHILD DATA |
Year |
Month |
Day | ||||
Child's Name |
Kenneth |
Date of Screening |
99 |
12 |
20 |
School/ Program |
Hand in Hand | |
Parents/ Guardian |
Birthdate |
96 |
10 |
16 |
Teacher |
Karen | ||
Address |
Age |
3 |
2 |
4 |
Assessor |
Joyce Cook | ||
|
B. SCREENING ASSESSMENTS
|
C. SCORING | |||
Number of |
Point |
Child's | ||
2.1A |
Personal Data Response: Orally gives |
0 |
2 |
0/6 |
3.2A |
Identifies Body Parts: Points to or touches: |
7 |
1 |
7/6 |
4.3A |
Gross Motor Skills: |
2 |
3 |
6/9 |
5.4 |
Identifies Objects: Points to picture of |
3 |
3 |
9/9 |
6.5A |
Repeats Sentences: Repeats sentences of |
3 |
3 |
9/9 |
7.6A |
Visual Motor Skills: Copies |
2 |
3 |
6/9 |
8.7A |
Number Concepts: Demonstrates by giving |
2 |
3 |
6/9 |
9.8A |
Builds Tower with Blocks: builds a tower with |
5 |
2 |
10/10 |
10.9 |
Matches Colors: Matches |
5 |
2 |
10/10 |
11.10A |
Picture Vocabulary: Names |
4 |
2 |
8/10 |
12.11 |
Plural s and -ing: Adds |
1 |
5 |
5/10 |
Total Score = |
76/100 | |||
D. OBSERVATIONS
E. SUMMARY (Complete only if child is screened with group)
F. RECOMMENDATIONS
|
Ontario Court of Justice (Name of Court) |
Court file number
| |
| at | 10 Louisa Street, Orangeville Ontario L9W 3P9 Court office address | |
Applicant(s) | |
Full legal name & address for service - street & number, municipality, postal code, telephone & fax numbers and e-mail address (if any). |
Lawyer's name & address - street & number, municipality, postal code, telephone & fax numbers and e-mail address (if any). |
The Children's Aid Society of the County of Dufferin
|
Wardlaw, Mullin, Carter, Thwaites and Ward
|
Respondent(s) | |
Full legal name & address for service- street & number, municipality, postal code, telephone & fax numbers and e-mail address (if any). |
Lawyer's name & address - street & number, municipality, postal code, telephone & fax numbers and e-mail address (if any). |
Robert McQuaid
| |
Linda Prosh
| |
My name is (full legal name) Trish Cox
I live in (municipality & province) Orangeville, Ontario
and I swear/affirm that the following is true:
Set out the statements of fact in consecutively numbered paragraphs. Where possible, each numbered paragraph should consist of one complete sentence and be limited to a particular statement of fact. If you learned a fact from someone else, you must give that person's name and state that you believe that fact to be true.
I, Trish Cox, of the Town or Orangeville in the County of Dufferin, make oath and say:
1. I am a Child Protection and Family Services Worker with The Children's Aid Society of the County of Dufferin. I am also a Registered Nurse with the College of Nurses of Ontario with a B.Sc.N. I have worked extensively with children in clinical and community settings and at one time coordinated and supervised the School Health Support Services for the Dufferin and Dufferin-Peel Boards of Education. I was involved daily in the assessment of the physical, developmental, emotional and social needs of children. I was required to have a comprehensive knowledge of the role, responsibilities and interventions of Occupational Therapists, Physical Therapists, Speech Therapists, Dieticians and Nurses as they worked with children in home and school environments.
2. On December 14th, 1999 I met with Mr McQuaid and Ms Prosh. Ken's room was bright and cheerful. The bedding was clean and fresh. The bed was age appropriate. Age appropriate toys were in evidence in the room. The closets contained season appropriate clothing. There was no lock on his door. The other areas of the house which I saw were stark and lacked warmth but were clean and free of safety concerns.
3. Mr McQuaid and Ms Prosh, during this visit described concerns related to Ken: 1. head banging on their bodies. Mrs Prosh showed me a 3 inch fading bruise on her groin where Ken had hit her while she was lying in bed. The parents report that Ken does the same on their legs in sensitive areas and that this has been happening as often as everyday or every other day and that this has been occuring for some time. The parents stated that he does not head bang on anything but themselves. 2. spitting at the parents which they report only started in the past two weeks. The parents expressed interest in the visit about how to deal with these behaviours. The parents are presently using different approaches. Mr McQuaid will deal with them with time outs or telling him to stop. Ms Prosh stated that she screamed the last time Ken banged his head on her groin. She sometimes says "no". Advice was given and acknowledged. During the meeting Ken was very busy. He would pull and hang on the curtains, hit his parents and myself, handle objects off limits to him. Mr McQuaid firmly and gently held Ken once when Ken was involved with the curtains. However, neither parent responded to Ken hitting them. During the visit the parents asked questions about toilet training. This was discussed briefly.
4. The parents reported in this visit that the pre-school had asked Ken to be assessed by the Dufferin Association for Community Living, Pre-School Resource Programme as the pre-school felt that there were developmental delays. Mr McQuaid and Ms Prosh reported that the pre-school found Ken to be aggressive with other children (hitting, spitting and throwing objects at them). The parents were surprised that the pre-school felt that there were developmental delays and spent some time highlighting what Ken could do and related this to their own milestones as children.
5. During this visit I observed that Ken communication was mainly in the form of echolalia, a compulsive repetition of what is spoken by another person. His speech was clear. He responded to simple one step commands. However, during the end of the interview, as consents were being obtained and the word "CAS" was used, Ken would respond each time with the word "evil".
6. On December 16th, 1999 I met with Lee Rivoire, Teacher and Karen Bowers, Supervisor of Hand-in-Hand Pre-School. They stated that Ken has been attending each day since enrollment with the usual length of stay of 8:30 am to 5:30 pm. The staff are concerned as Ken speaks with echolalia, does not interact with the other children, rarely participates in circle time. They report that he does not know how to play with toys except cause and effect toys. The staff have found over the last two weeks that Ken has difficulty with transitions (going to the washroom, cleaning up, going to circle time) and will scream and tantrum when asked to do these things. The staff state that the parents have told them that they use plastic utensils with Ken as he throws things and they are afraid of being stabbed by him. Ken consistently throws objects at the pre-school and the staff are worried about the safety of the other children. Ken hits the children and spits on them and the staff. The staff is concerned as Ken says "bad boy" with his behaviours and the mother has told the staff she calls him that. The staff report that Ken does not have self-help skills ie. toilet trained, uses a sippy cup. They have noticed that he bangs his head, front and back, on the door, wall, chair and will say to himself "not funny" and laugh, or "that's a bad habit". The staff state that at nap time, Ken does not sleep and will suck his thumb, hit his head with his fist and laugh and rock. He has also gotten up and thrown toys around at other children. The supervisor reports that they had no indication from his parents of any problems with Ken at registration and feel he needs 1:1 supervision. The staff state that Ken leaves his parents easily and is happy to see both of them when they return. Ms Rivoire reports one time that another mother with blonde hair was leaving and Ken attempted to go with her. The staff state that the parents are happy to see Ken on pick up and are interested in how he is doing. Mr McQuaid picks up Ken the majority of the time. They report that Ken has a good appetite, is appropriately dressed, clean and tidy. They also noted that regarding his echolalia, with one exception Ken demonstrated the ability to engage, ask a question and indicate a process with communication. Ken was told that "Tara will bring you that toy". When the girl brought him the toy, Ken asked, "Are you Tara?". I verily believe this to be true.
7. On December 17th, 1999 I met with Nina Little, Infant Development Worker with Dufferin Child and Family Services. She noted that Mr McQuaid was more relaxed with her but that both parents were mainly spectators throughout the visit. She did observe that Mr McQuaid engaged Ken a little with some turntaking. The father, however, asked Ken for his Barney figure and when given it, kept it even though Ken wanted it back. Later when Ken was asked for another toy by his father, Ken would not bring it over. During her assessment visit Ken was playing in the curtains. Mr McQuaid dealt with this by holding Ken on his lap while vigorously patting his back, saying to Ms Little that they are now using zero tolerance. The intervention did not calm Ken or reduce his activity. Ms Little was informed by the parents that Ken was spitting, throwing things at the pre-school and the parents stated that Ken wouldn't be able to stay if the behaviour continues. They reported that Ken had been referred to the Dufferin Association for Community Living by the pre-school staff. Ms Little also suggested a referral to a Speech and Language Therapist for the echolalia. Ms Little noted the following about Ken: 1. Ken remembered activities that he was involved in with her from three weeks ago and was capable of representational play (ie. would feed a baby doll with a bottle). He was also capable of focussing for a significant period of time on a variety of play tasks. 2. when Ken looked into a mirror he would say Ken good boy, or Ken evil and laugh. The parents laughed when he said this. 3. when Ken was shown a crocodile whose mouth opened, his father said to Ken: "look it eats little boys; 4. Ken has limited ability to self care ie. dress and feed himself. The parents state they even load his fork with food and Ken will often eat with his fingers; 5. the developmental assessment (Ages and Stages) indicates that Ken has poor gross motor, problem solving and personal and social skills. Ken's fine motor skills were appropriate. Communication could not be accurately assessed with this tool. Ms Little was very concerned with the severity and number of concerns that she observed and the contrast in ability. She stated that Ken would benefit from and assessment by a child psychiatrist.
8. Information from Dr R Murphy, paediatrician and Wil Weiner, therapist was not available at this time. Their input is necessary to clarify and define aspects of the above observations. Ken McQuaid can present, in isolated and/or controlled circumstances to function within acceptable developmental limits. For example, form a question without prompting which initiates a relationship and relates to his external environment. He is also able to remember past processes and use representational play. Ken, however, for the most part is below in many of his developmental milestones and demonstrates severe aggressive hehaviours. He also demonstrates self-soothing and self-stiming behaviours. As well, the parents inconsistencies in parenting and unusual interactions with Ken is concerning to the Society. A parenting capacity assessment is still seen as necessary because of the latter and the fact that no interventions were put in place prior to the involvement of the Society.
9. I make this statement with no improper intent.
Sworn/Affirmed before me at
(municipality)
Town of Orangeville
in
(province, state or country)
Ontario
on
(date)
December 21, 1999 Gary Brian Putman
Commissioner for taking affidavits (Type or print below if signature is illegible) |
| | | | | | | |
Trish Cox
Signature
(This form is to be signed in front
of a lawyer, justice of the peace, notary public or
commissioner for taking affidavits.) |
| Applicant(s) |
CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY |
(Full legal name) | |
| Counsel |
DAVID THWAITES |
(Full name & telephone number) | |
| Respondent(s) |
McQUAID / PROSH |
(Full legal name) | |
| Counsel |
EVELYN HUBER |
(Full name & telephone number) |
Parties Present: ApplicantX CounselX RespondentX CounselX COMSOC__
Reason for adjournment to allow for Developmental Assessment of Child
All parties consent to adjourn this matter from Dec 22/99 to January 19, 2000 at 10 AM in courtroom # ___
Status quo to continue
Applicant(s) signature
David Thwaites
Counsel's signature
Parental Support Worker's Signature
Robert T McQuaid
Respondent(s) signature
Evelyn Huber
Counsel's signature
Children's Lawyer signature
Dated at the Town of Orangeville this 22 day of December , 1999 .
Consent Adjournment Requirements:
If all parties agree
to an adjournment, this Consent Adjournment Request must
be properly completed and delivered to the court clerk.
The parties may be released once the clerk has approved
the adjournment date as available unless there still
remains a matter in dispute which needs to be addressed
by the judge. The onus is on the party requesting the
adjournment to contact all other parties not present and
inform them of the next court appearance date and time.
ADJOURNMENT DATE CONFIRMED WITH COURT CLERK: ____
(clerk's initials)
Handwritten document.
IN THE MATTER OF KENNETH DARRYL McQUAID born OCTOBER 16, 1996
CONSENT
THE PARTIES HERETO CONSENT TO AN ORDER on the following terms and conditions:
Dated this 19th day of January 2000 at the Town of Orangeville.
/signed/ Linda Prosh
/signed/ Robert McQuaid
/signed/ Trish Cox CAS for Dufferin
The Banner Extra
Vol 3 No 95 Tuesday January 25, 2000
(advertisement)
DUFFERIN Child and Family Services (Incorporated as The Children's Aid Society of the County of Dufferin) Dufferin Child and Family Services is a not-for-profit social service agency which strives to advocate for and provide co-ordinated quality services for children, families and individuals in Dufferin County. Our primary service focus is on children most in need of counselling, support and protection from abuse and neglect, while supporting families in their central role of caring for and nurturing children. WE NEED FOSTER PARENTS IN DUFFERIN COUNTY! Dufferin Child and Family Services regular foster care program is currently seeking 4 homes for school age children and adolescents and 2 homes for infant and pre-school children. If you are interested in learning more about being a foster parent for children of your community, plan on attending an INFORMATION SESSION
There will be a presentation that will help to answer any questions you may have regarding fostering, and to explain the approval process for foster homes in Dufferin County. |
January 29, 2000
The Children's Aid Society of the County of Dufferin
50 Fourth Avenue Unit 13
Orangeville Ontario L9W 4P1
dcafs@headwaters.com
Dear Sirs/Madams:
I wish to become a member of the Children's Aid Society of the County of Dufferin. As I understand from your notice in the Orangeville Banner, persons over age 18 years residing in Dufferin County are eligible on payment of the three dollar annual fee.
Please indicate by return E-mail where I can pay the three dollars.
Robert T McQuaid
RR 5 Orangeville Ontario L9W 2Z2
phone: 519-942-0565
(Not getting any response to the foregoing email, I visited the office of Children's Aid on February 3, 2000, with the three dollar membership fee. I handed it personally to Irene Beazley. Two letters arrived in our mail on February 7, 2000, one addressed to Robert McQuaid, the other to Linda Prosh, but otherwise identical. Both letters were dated February 1, 2000, but stamped through the Children's Aid postage meter on February 3, 2000. This note is not part of the court file. - RTMQ)
February 1, 2000
Ms Linda Prosh
RR 5
Orangeville, Ontario
L9W 2Z2
Dear Ms Prosh:
RE: REPORT TO CHILD ABUSE REGISTER
This letter is to advise you that your name is being forwarded to the Ministry of Community and Social Services Central Abuse Register. Our investigation supports the initial referral information received in November 1999, alleging that you had put your child at risk of physical harm as defined in section 37.2(B), that your son demonstrated developmental concerns as defined in section 37.2(H) and your son has suffered emotional harm as defined in section 37.2(F) of the Child and Family Services Act, Revised Statutes of Ontario, 1990, Chapter 11 as amended.
The Central Abuse Register is a file for the Province of Ontario and persons who have been found to have abused a child can find their names placed on this list.
When your name has been received by the register you will be notified by letter and have the opportunity to appeal the decision and request that your name be withdrawn.
Thank You.
K James Kim James
|
Kimberley Evans Kimberley Evans
|
| Gary Putman BA MSW Executive Director |
Tel 519-941-1530 Fax 519-941-1525 |
50 Fourth Ave Unit 13 Orangeville ON L9W 4P1 |
www.headwaters.com/dcafs/ dcafs@headwaters.com |
| Child Protective Service | Children's Mental Heath Service |
Developmental Support Service |
Dufferin Children's Fund |
February 2, 2000
Concerns with CAS
For the last few weeks there has been an advertisement in the classified section asking if anyone has had problems with the Dufferin County CAS (Children's Aid Society). A number of responses have been received, even though most people are reluctant to step forward.
Those who have stepped forward have some valid concerns and problems with this agency. Over the weekend a number of those people gathered for a meeting near the Orangeville area to voice their concerns.
In most cases the major complaint is the heavy-handedness of this agency and the way it operates by being confrontational in its approach, by not informing parents of their rights in these matters and an abuse of power by removing children from their homes without warrants on the basis of flimsy evidence.
Also of concern are direct lies told the parents by some workers eventually leading the the destruction of the family unit.
According to spokesperson Catharine Cote of the Voices for Children Alliance (VOAC), a group set up to combat this abuse of power, "these types of problems should be sounding alarm bells off as they are not only happening in Dufferin County, but seem to be systemic throughout the province.
"There is nothing new about these cases. These practices have been going on for some time now. My experience with the CAS has been that fly swatters are used where an elephant gun is needed and an elephant gun used where a fly swatter is needed".
In one case discussed over the weekend, the children were removed from school without the parents being notified. The parents found out only when the children did not return home after school and the police were notified of their absence. Then they were told that the children had in fact been removed by the CAS. The major reason for there removal was simply "poor housekeeping practices".
Among the prime targets for the CAS are single parents with children under the age of six.
In targeting single, economically deprived parents, these agencies know that their resources for legal representation are limited and these cases are easily won as there parents soon run out of money.
As a result of parents being encouraged to stay at home and raise their children there is now a shortage of children available for adoption while the numbers of people wanting to adopt have risen.
In effect this gives the government a potential reign of terror over these families.
In one of the cases discussed the children were apprehended and placed for adoption before the parent was even brought to trial and in this case the reason for apprehension was financial deprivation.
What's ironic in this case is the fact that the parent had called the CAS asking for help.
Let's take a look at who benefits from this industry, and it is certainly not the families involved.
- A Concerned Parent
I placed an ad in the Orangeville Banner asking for CAS experiences, and I have spoken to the Concerned Parent author and most of the CAS victims alluded to in the article. Every person responding to my ad was reluctant to leave his name. In most cases the bullying they described by CAS was worse than stated in the article. All of the children who were targets of crown wardship applications were free of physical defects. In two cases from anonymous callers, crown wardship applications were withdrawn when hidden physical defects were found, but later research has discredited these calls. - RTMQ.
This cover letter came in response to a phone inquiry from me to Irene Beazley for a copy of the bylaws. -RTMQ
February 9, 2000
Robert T McQuaid
RR #5 Orangeville ON L9W 2Z2
Dear Mr McQuaid,
I am forwarding a copy of our by-laws as promised.
I recently spoke with you when you paid the $3.00 CAS membership fee. We are presently in the process of renewing memberships and I will be contacting the Secretary-Treasurer of our Board of Directors to sign membership cards for the 200-01 year. Once this has been done a membership card will be sent to you.
Thank you for your interest in our agency.
Yours sincerely,
Irene Beazley
Irene Beazley, Senior Administrative Assistant
/ib
Encl
| Gary Putman BA MSW Executive Director |
Tel 519-941-1530 Fax 519-941-1525 |
50 Fourth Ave Unit 13 Orangeville ON L9W 4P1 |
www.headwaters.com/dcafs/ dcafs@headwaters.com |
| Child Protective Service | Children's Mental Heath Service |
Developmental Support Service |
Dufferin Children's Fund |
|
|
![]() |
February 9, 2000
Mr Robert T McQuaid
RR 5 Orangeville, Ontario L9W 2Z2
Dear Mr McQuaid:
David Tilson, the Member of Provincial Parliament for Dufferin-Peel-Wellington-Grey, has forwarded me a copy of your letter concerning the Children's Aid Society. I apologize for the unacceptable delay in my response.
I appreciate the time you have taken to write about this matter and your comments have been noted. Please understand that as the issue you raise is currently before the courts, it would be inappropriate for me to comment on this matter.
Thank you for writing.
Sincerely,
illegible
John Baird, MPP
Minister
cc: Vince Tedesco, Director, Central West Region David Tilson, MPP Dufferin-Peel-Wellington-Grey
Children's Aid kept this letter secret until May 31, 2000 when Trish Cox handed a copy to Linda Prosh as a fait accompli. It is the centerpiece of the next steps in litigation.
Children's Hospital |
PO Box 2000
|
(905) 521-2100 |
|
| ||
February 10, 2000 Ms Trish Cox
|
| |
Dear Ms. Cox:
RE: McQuaid-Prosh Family CAAP Assessment
Thank you for your referral of the above-named family to the Child Advocacy & Assessment Program. The referral has been accepted and the following appointments have been scheduled. Please advise the family of the following appointments:
Robert McQuaid, Linda Prosh and Kenneth McQuaid
Wednesday, June 28 @ 11:00 am
Friday, July 7 @ 10:45 am
Friday July 14 @ 9:30 am
Friday, July 21 @ 10:45 am (Observation Session with Kenneth)
Friday, August 11 @ 10:45 am (Feedback Session for Robert & Linda)
Trish Cox and Nina Little
Wednesday, July 12 @ 10:00 am
All appointments are in the 3F clinic (third floor, colour red) at Chedoke-McMaster Hospitals, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton. Upon your arrival, the receptionist should be advised that you have an appointment with CAAP.
Sincerely,
Linda Harris
Program Assistant
Child Advocacy & Assessment Program
/ljh
| HAMILTON
HEALTH SCIENCES C o r p o r a t i o n |
Children's Hospital at Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation is affiliated with the Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University |
February 16, 2000
Children's Aid responds to Feb 2 letter
We are responding to the letter published in your February 2nd edition by "A Concerned Parent". Child protection is a difficult undertaking, filled with much emotion by all parties involved. As child protection workers we represent children who are most often left without a voice to express their experiences and who are unable to take actions to protect themselves from neglect and abuse.
Our staff work with a large number of families every year. The majority of our work does not involved bringing children into our care. In fact, there are many families who work with the Society on a voluntary basis. The nature of our work, however, can result in our involvement with parents in an involuntary and intrusive manner.
As a result, we are not surprised, and in fact might expect, that some parents would be less than pleased with our interventions on behalf of their children. The article published in the February edition tries to set out some concerns about our agency which are not unfamiliar to us, as most have already been heard and attempts at resolution have been made.
However, since the complaints have now been raised in a public forum, we feel an obligation to respond in order to accurately inform our community.
Children's Aid Societies are subject to many checks and balances on our legislated powers to intervene into peoples lives. Children's Aid Societies are able to investigate allegations and even to remove children from their parents, with or without a warrant, when there are reasonable grounds to believe they are at risk of neglect or abuse or immediate harm.
Where children are involuntarily removed or "apprehended", Societies must seek a court order within five days to maintain those children in its care and as such are subject to judicial review of all their actions.
One example given in the recent article stated that children had been apprehended because of "poor housekeeping practices". Children are not apprehended because of a lower than average standard of housekeeping, which the author of the article would lead readers to believe. Children are apprehended because of feces on the floor, spoiled food on the counters, mattresses with urine that children are made to sleep in over and over.
Essentially, the standard of living needs to be such that a child's medical health is at risk before they would be apprehended. In fact, in one very long term situation of this nature, the Society spent thousands of dollars to provide housekeeping and support services to try and maintain a group of siblings with their parents rather than remove them.
Another case cited in the article states that children were put up for adoption before a trial occurred. Children cannot be adopted before they have been made a crown ward by the courts or with the parents written consents. To suggest that child protection workers target certain sectors of our community or remove children solely to place them for adoption is grossly inaccurate and certainly could not be supported by the records of the family court in this jurisdiction.
The Society works with a wide variety of people. These are single parent families and there are two parent families, there are low income and very high income families. The Society does not choose who it will become involved with. Neighbours, professionals, children and spouses make reports to us and the Society is responsible to act upon those reports.
We do that with highly educated social work staff supported by senior supervisory staff with many years experience. When the Society initiates court action, Ontario Legal Aid guarantees representation for low income parents in child welfare hearings. it is always our goal in court actions to minimize court time and cost by trying to reach agreement between all parties while not jeopardizing the safety of the children involved. The legitimate access by parents to proper legal representation in child welfare hearings is closely guarded by the family courts and supported by our staff.
In addition to judicial reviews, Children's Aid Societies are legally subject to the supervision of the Ministry of Community and Social Services through three annual case audits, annual foster care licensing reviews and supervision by Ministry staff.
Societies are also required by law to have local mechanisms to allow parents or children to voice their concerns and to reach a resolution of the concerns through a progressive process involving agency staff, the voluntary community Board and finally the Ministry of Community and Social Services.
Any client of Dufferin Child and Family Services is made aware of this during service or upon request either verbally or through a pamphlet which clearly outlines the process. Naturally, as a public agency it is not uncommon for us to also be publically accountable to our community through media reports such as this. Despite these many avenues of accountability, some individuals will always be unsatisfied.
There are many families involved with the Society who are simply going through some challenges in their lives and require some assistance. There are also families who are harmful to their children, and whose children require protection.
We fundamentally believe that children should be raised by their own families. However, if a child is being harmed physically, sexually, emotionally or otherwise neglected their needs and rights will be paramount in our actions.
We recognize that some individuals will always be critical. Despite that, we believe they have a right to express legitimate concerns and complaints and we will continue to go the extra mile to attempt a resolution.
Those individuals who recently met to share their concerns about our agency are most welcome to again address them directly to me, jointly with the President of our Board of Directors. You may call me at 941-1530 Ext 224, to arrange a convenient meeting time and/or you may wish to provide your views in writing for our review.
Gary Putman
Executive Director
Since Linda would consent only to internet publicity, not print journalism, I was unable to send the following response, even after a day of discussion. - RTMQ
On February 2, 2000 you published a letter relating to Children's Aid signed by "A Concerned Parent", followed on February 16 by a rebuttal from Gary Putman, Executive Director of Dufferin Children's Aid.
I am one of the people attacked by Mr Putman's organization. On November 16, 1999 an action was initiated against us by taking our child with the aid of a warrant and two OPP officers. We then had to plead for conditions to have our child returned, events meeting the dictionary definition of kidnaping. I was astonished to find that such a legal procedure existed.
In the intervening three months I have undertaken a crash education in this area. The law is titled "The Child and Family Services Act" (1984), enacted at a time of hysteria about child-molesters. In thousands of words, there are no provisions protective of parents. The law allows Children's Aid Societies to take children from their parents and place them in foster homes under the doctrine of "the best interests of the child". With this doctrine, some Canadian Indian bands suffered half of their children adopted out to white families. Indian objections to slow genocide led to protections from the law, but only for Indians. In 1999 amendments, every revision makes it easier for Children's Aid to remove children from their natural parents.
There is a pervasive fear among all persons having contact with Children's Aid, extending even to those not yet involved but subject to denunciation. I have personally spoken to most of the people mentioned by A Concerned Parent. It was difficult to get any of them to give a name or phone number, out of fear of retaliation by Children's Aid.
As Mr Putman states, some clients come to Children's Aid voluntarily, but all I have spoken to regret their decision to do so.
As for "poor housekeeping practices", Mr Putman says removal only occurs for such abuses as feces on the floor (did you ever drop something during a diaper change?), spoiled food on the counters (ever have spoilage in your kitchen?) or mattresses with urine. He neglects to mention that Children's Aid routinely makes these allegations regardless of the facts.
I have the names of a mother and the adoptive family that took her children before her trial. Only paper formalities remained for the aftermath. The law grants Children's Aid a club called crown wardship, ending parental rights so they can never see their own children again. By law, the same agency that takes children from their natural parents supplies them to adoptive parents. The law provides for crown wardship when "there is a substantial risk that the child will suffer physical harm, inflicted by the person having charge of the child or caused by that person's failure to care and provide for or to supervise and protect the child adequately". This provision could strip children from Mother Teresa.
The legal aid touted by Mr Putman is no doubt available, but is useless in the face of laws that give all power to Children's Aid. Children's Aid workers have immunity from all legal actions. As for appeal through the agency itself or the ministry, the minister will ignore any case before the courts.
Mr Putman continues " ... could not be supported by the records of the family court in this jurisdiction". This is true because the court records are secret. I was turned down in a request to see the files, and I could not even count Children's Aid cases. I challenge Mr Putman to open his records to research so a scientist can count children protected from abuse as well as false allegations of abuse.
|
|
|
Robert McQuaid
Linda Prosh (one copy mailed to each)
RR 5
Orangeville ON L9W 2Z2
Dear Mr McQuaid:
This letter is to inform you that you were reported to the Family and Children's Services County of Dufferin as allegedly having abused Kenneth McQuaid. Following their investigation, the Society is now satisfied that the information is verified and reportable abuse occurred. The Society is required by law, Child and Family Services Act (CFSA) Section 75(3), to send a report on this matter to the Child Abuse Register, held in Toronto by the Ministry of Community and Social Services.
The Child Abuse Register is maintained by the Ministry of Community and Social Services pursuant to Section 75(5) of the CFSA. The Register is used as a tool in the overall effort to protect children and in the prevention of child abuse. More specifically, information maintained on it provides a general register check for child abuse investigations conducted by Children's Aid Societies. Statistical data is also drawn from information on the Register.
If any further report of abuse by you is received by and Children's Aid Society, the fact that you are on the Register may be made known to that Society.
The law states that you or your representative may examine the Register. You may request that your name be removed or that the Register be otherwise amended.
As a result of this request, the Director may at that stage decide to remove your name from the Register. Before he can refuse your request, you are entitled to a hearing by the Director or his designate.
For further details, see the attached excerpt from the CFSA, 1984.
If you have any questions about the collection of this information or if you wish to examine your information or seek an expunction, call or write to Sandra MacAulay at the above phone number or address.
Yours truly,
M R Seymour
MR Seymour
Director
Encl. (CFSA sections 75-76 were enclosed)
cc: Children's Aid Society Orangeville Ontario
File No: 2000-00154
THE CHILD ABUSE REGISTER
The Child and Family Services Act requires that the local Children's Aid Society (CAS) investigate all reports of suspected child abuse. After its investigation, the staff of the CAS then decide whether the information verifies that there was an incident of abuse. The CAS also decides what action to take to protect the abused child. If the CAS decides, on the basis of their review, that abuse has occurred, a report must then be sent to the Child Abuse Register at the head office of the Ministry of Community and Social Services.
The purpose of the Register is to enable Children's Aid Societies to find out quickly whether a child or an alleged abuser has been involved in any previous case. This information will help them in deciding what the proper protection for the child should be. The Register serves to record the name of the abused child, the name of the alleged abuser and a few details such as the date of the incident, the child's age and the name of the CAS that made the report. All the information in the Register is carefully protected under the law and remains highly confidential.
If however, a child is repeatedly abused, or an adult continues to abuse children, the Children's Aid Society has access to this information which may help them arrive at better decisions for helping the abuser and protecting the child.
Director for the Child Abuse Register
[Before our organizing, Children's Aid had 32 members. I sent each of them this letter, getting two proxies in return. The letter may have come to the judge's attention indirectly. -RTMQ]
Help Fix Children's Aid!
The Dufferin Children's Aid Society has switched from
protecting children to attacking families. Specific
policies are permanent removal of children from intact
families, long-term removal of children for trifling
abuses, failure to provide in-family assistance for
families with serious problems, undermining parental
authority in families with teen-aged children, and
avoidance of serious child-abuse cases by turning
against the accusers.
The best interest of the child is in keeping his
parents. Children's Aid should apply its resources to
protect children by assisting and preserving families,
not attacking them.
Specific policies we advocate are:
- Children should not be removed from homes until the
parents have had an opportunity to respond to the
complaints against them.
- Since the most abusive homes are broken homes, foster
homes and group homes, children should be removed from
families only when the families provide a level of
care worse than foster homes.
- Children's Aid workers should stop omitting facts
favorable to families in court filings.
- Children's Aid should abide by its agreements with
parents.
We are asking for your proxy to cast your vote at the
annual general meeting of Children's Aid. These proxies
will be used to vote for two directors
- Lillian Brewer. Lillian has two children and two
grandchildren. She is employed as a factory worker.
- Robert T McQuaid. Robert has one child. He has been
the president of Quaid Software Limited since 1983.
The terms of the directors end in June of 2003. Neither
of these candidates has previously served as an officer
or director of Children's Aid, and neither has any
financial obligation to Childrens's Aid, nor anticipates
any financial loss or gain as a result of this election.
Directors serve without compensation. You are free to
revoke this proxy later by signing another one, or by
attending the meeting in person.
If you want to help fix Children's Aid, please date and
sign the enclosed proxy form, and return it in the
envelope provided. Feel free to call with any
questions.
June 5, 2000
/signed/
Robert T McQuaid RR 5 Orangeville Ontario L9W 2Z2
phone: 519-942-0565
Disgruntled residents unsuccessful in bid to join DCFS board
THE BANNER, Orangeville, FRIDAY, June 23, 2000
Robert McQuaid and Lillian Brewer want to see some changes at local agency
by ELIZABETH JACKMAN
For the Banner
A bit of controversy surrounded this year's annual general meeting of Dufferin Child and Family Services held Tuesday evening at the Monora Park Pavilion.
Two local people decided to run against the four incumbents on the 12-member board of directors.
According to Gary Putman, Executive Director, every year four vacancies come up on the board.
Candidates are usually chosen by a nominating committee however, the bylaw does allow for any two members of the society to nominate two people.
This year, the new members, Robert McQuaid and Lillian Brewer, who have become disgruntled with the Child and Family Services, decided to take advantage of the bylaw and run.
"In my 22 years experience, it has always been the nominating committee choosing four candidates. This year there were six individuals running for four spots", said Putman.
Although McQuaid and Brewer were unsuccessful in their bid to gain a seat on the board, McQuaid says he is not going to give up his attempts to try to bring about reforms to the service.
"Children's Aid has become a group that is distinctly anti-family. Quite a few families have been relentlessly attacked by Children's Aid, and even when they find out no child abuse has occurred, (they) continue the attack", said McQuaid.
McQuaid is a Mono resident who has had personal dealings with the DCFS.
The other candidate, Lillian Brewer, says she ran for the position because she wanted to see if she could help families stay together, which doesn't seem to be what is happening now.
"They are pulling children out of the home instead of finding ways to keep them there", said Brewer. "No one I have talked to that have had anything to do with Child and Family Services hasn't had a problem, but they won't speak up because they are afraid of them. You are just one phone call away from losing your children because you are automatically guilty until proven innocent".
"I would like to see them focus more on the family unit", said Brewer. "People have asked for help and then they turned it against them and took their young kids. It should be a place for children to be safe and taken care of".
Brewer, who like McQuaid has had personal dealings with the agency, said she ran to make a point, that she doesn't believe in what they are doing.
Putman would not comment on either case, other than to say, "the issues raised by the two candidates were individual issues to their particular situation and they do not reflect the philosophy of this organization or the Child and Family Services Act. We do have clients on our board, our membership simply chose not to elect these two individuals".
Both McQuaid and Brewer said that when Child and Family Services realized what was going on they signed on about 40 new members, including many policemen to prevent them from being elected.
McQuaid says he feels something has to be done, or the problems will continue on a larger scale. "They have to realize, that breaking up a family is not going to accomplish anything", said McQuaid.
Next chronologically
Posted by
Dufferin VOCA