BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE E. FEDAK
on September 7, 2005 at KITCHENER Ontario
P. Ringrose and D. Boles v. A. Ellis
THE COURT: I have one suggestion. this is going
to be my order...
MR. KELLER: Okay.
THE COURT: ... that within 15 days there will be
a retraction and an apology to these two gentlemen for
what he has done, failing which he will be jailed for
a period of 30 days.
MR. KELLER: Thank you, Your Honour. And exactly
how, Your Honour, is he to publish the retraction
because he circulated it widely. I would ask that he,
you know, almost that he publish it in the newspaper
apologizing for what he's done.
THE COURT: Well, unfortunately by publishing trash
you are...
MR. KELLER: Yeah, no, I understand that.
THE COURT: ... bringing it to the attention of
somebody who might not have heard about it. I think a
personal apology by letter to these two gentlemen and
to the Children's Aid Society ...
MR. KELLER: And to Mr. Chalk (ph) as well.
THE COURT: And Mr. Chalk (ph) and we should give
a copy of this to the police, the Kitchener Police as
well, so that they would be in the ... know exactly
what is happening and if there is no such apology, 30
days.
MR. KELLER: Okay. Is Your Honour going to
endorse something, sir?
THE COURT: That is your last chance.
MR. KELLER: Okay, Is Your Honour going to endorse
something to that effect?
THE COURT: I am going to endorse it to that
effect.
MR. KELLER: Should we wait for it now, or is Your
Honour going to issue something?
THE COURT: I will do it right now.
MR. KELLER: Okay, great.
THE COURT: In fact, you can help me with the
wording exactly to make sure that it is very
effectively dealt with.
MR. KELLER: Thank you, Your Honour.
THE COURT: Today is September 7th, 2005. For the
record though I wanted to make a finding that I just
did not come up with this. There is a flagrant
disregard for Justice Reilly's order. Mr. Ellis
appears to be very articulate and bright, but maybe
perhaps misguided, but he certainly cannot argue that
he did not know what he was doing here. This is
obviously designed liable, it is slander of all
these... Chalk(ph), Ringrose and Boles and there has
to be a penalty, but I want him to show the remorse by
giving him that chance. If he shows no remorse, the
jails will be happy to accept him for a nice visit of
30 days. And consider yourself lucky for getting a
guy like me sitting here today.
MR. ELLIS: Thank you, Your Honour.
THE COURT: Mr Ellis is found in contempt. Order
to go that he is to send a written retraction and
apology to Messieurs Chalk(ph), Ringrose and Boles by
sending them this correspondence at their workplace
and to notify the Children's Aid and the Waterloo
Regional Police Services within 15 days. Failure to
do so will result in a jail term of 30 days. Now, how
do we trigger that?
MR. KELLER: Well, Your Honour, what I was going
to suggest is that we adjourn this application to
another date beyond the 15 days so that it can be
dealt with if, in fact, he doesn't comply.
THE COURT: Al right. Adjourned balance of this
motion to Wednesday, October 12th.
MR. KELLER: Thank you. May I speak to the issue
of costs, Your Honour?
THE COURT: Sure.
Reporter's Note: Submissions as to cost by both
sides recorded, but not transcribed as per request.
MR. KELLER: And just one comment with respect to
your endorsement, Your Honour.
THE COURT: Yes.
MR. KELLER: With respect to the word apology, I'd
ask that you add the adjectives unambiguous and
unreserved apology so that he doesn't try some sort of
left handed apology for his actions.
THE COURT: A written unambiguous and an unreserved
retraction and apology.
MR. KELLER: Thank you, Your Honour.
THE COURT: Do you understand that, Mr. Ellis?
MR. ELLIS: I certainly do, Your Honour.
THE COURT: I am sure you do understand me.
MR. ELLIS: Yes.
THE COURT: You seem to be very good with the
language.
MR. ELLIS: Thank you, Your Honour.
MR. KELLER: Thank you, sir.
THE COURT: Do not waste your talents on frivolous
matters.
I, Tracy Eybel, certify that this document is a true
and accurate transcript of the recording of Ringrose and
Boles v. Ellis in the Ontario Superior court of Justice
held at 200 Frederick Street, Kitchener, Ontario, taken
from recording No. 4499-4-154/2005-10, which has been
certified in Form 1.